Hi, On Feb 3, 3:58 pm, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hin...@fastmail.net> wrote:
> Gradle would be just a development dependency, right? Users of my > library would not need to install Gradle I guess. Yes. The users of your library can use whatever they want: maven, ant +ivy, gradle, wget, bit hand carry, ... They specify the dependency and get your jar. > My main issue with Gradle is that it's yet another tool to learn :-( True. But worth it AFAICT up to now. You can easily handle multiple projects with a single build.gradle, if you like, minimising boilerplate as much as possible. It is sufficiently flexible to do custom stuff without losing too much hair. With clojuresque there also some rough edges left. So it's by no way perfect, but does a pretty good job on the standard project. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
