Something I wanted to mention is that this could provide a use case for an Scheme style cond macro, especially if the processing logic got more involved -- have a look at my scond if you'd like:
http://gist.github.com/293212 Basically this would allow you to write things like (scond [(re-matches first-regex line) :>> process-result-1] [(re-matches second-regex line) :>> process-result-2] [(re-matches third-regex line)] ; return the matches without further processing, if any [:else (give-up)]) Although I suppose Meikel Brandmeyer's pointer may be more clojuresque... To redeem myself after proposing something so nonidiomatic, I'd like to point out that instead of wrapping the for in a dorun, you could replace the for with doseq. :-) Sincerely, Michal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
