On Feb 2, 3:23 am, ataggart <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 12:19 am, "A.Rost" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I would like to have them available, simply because I
> > like concise, purpose-built languages.
>
> That seems to presuppose you cannot have concise, purpose-built
> languages with functions and macros.  That may be the case, but I'd
> like to see some rationale behind it.  So far the only reason I can
> think of to have a reader macro is to affect the *reader*.

That should read: with *only* functions and macros.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to