On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Timothy Pratley <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it be better to throw an exception if nothing was specified to > load instead of returning true/false... Because :foo is a keyword, > making it a valid argument to use and require, but no load target is > specified. I've uploaded a patch to the ticket Raoul created: > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure/tickets/253-Improve-errors-for--use---require--in-REPL
sounds to me like a good change. (i think in an ideal world, the system would have error messages that explain more verbosely what happened. like that the given keyword isn't one that is supported, or no load target given, etc., but that requires a little more serious usability care and study to get right.) sincerely. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
