hi, On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:08 PM, DanL <leidis...@gmail.com> wrote: > That I show you this doesn't necessarily mean that you should use it: > (let [x [true true false true]] > (eval `(and ~...@x)))
ah. yes, i believe i've recently read on this list that eval can easily be the "now you have 2 problems" sort of a solution :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
