On Jan 21, 8:37 pm, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote: > Clojure stresses immutability, and dependencies should be no > different. I'd say it's bad form to force a dependency on an > unreleased version of Clojure, because it's a moving target. Granted,
BTW, Clojure also stresses *controlled mutability*. I'd say it's bad form to impose a value judgment in place of a technical solution. If some 1.2 features make for a better project development experience, why rule them out? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
