Chris Dean <ctd...@sokitomi.com> writes: >> I really like the clojure.contrib.logging library, but I find myself >> often getting tricked into thinking it works like println: > > My $0.02: Checking the the type of the last arg seems too dwim to me, > but it will certainly work. I've been thinking recently that > info/warn/etc should be println or printf like and not take an > exception, while log itself should be the only thing that does take an > exception. That would break lots of code, so it's probably off the > table.
Yeah, backwards-compatibility is the reason I kept it so it could take an exception for the last argument. I agree that it's cleaner to just use the log macro directly if you have a throwable argument, but unfortunately since this library is part of contrib it's not really possible to make breaking changes. -Phil
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
