> Enlive is about as clean as you could ask for in this respect, > though, even cleaner than Lift, so I don't think this is inherently a > language issue.
Aye. XML literals aren't really a substitute for templates IMO. > As for the OO vs functional . . . a web server is a function from a > request to a response. How is that functional view any less natural > than an OO view? I think someone steeped in the controller/action viewpoint (a la Rails) would disagree: they see requests as being parameterized actions taken on/by controllers, with those requests being described by URI templates and routed by a route specification. Me, I'm happy with the functional approach :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
