Hi, Am 02.01.2010 um 15:23 schrieb Roger Gilliar:
> I'm just trying to understand why I would use :>> in a condp expression. The > followjg code shows how I tried to write a test for condp, but the question > remains. Why would I want to use :>> ? See here: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/d9ef152e19f5416b It always interesting when the return value of the testing function is of interest. Eg. with some… (condp some foo #{a b} :>> do-stuff-with-a-or-b #{x y} :>> same-with-x-or-y do-default) So here it is interesting what was actually the match… Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
