Hi, Am 02.01.2010 um 12:23 schrieb Konrad Hinsen:
> (deftype Bar > [i] > Foo > (foo [] (new Bar (inc i)))) > > Its drawback is relying on an undocumented feature: the value of Foo > inside the methods is the class Foo being defined. Isn't this only the case for AOT compiled deftype? For dynamic it's Bar_123 or so. Concerning the performance impact: When used in a homogeneous environment, the extend version will be almost as fast as the directly defined method, if I understood Rich correctly. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
