> That one is elegant, but uses more than the minimum number of > additions, one of the conditions I mentioned in the original post. (In
Ah yes... *now* I see that requirement. Well, thanks for the interesting exercise in any case. :-) -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
