On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote: > Steve, > I've been checking out the Java, and it looks the same to me. I think > this raises a couple issues: > > 1. Should sorted versions get transient support in 1.1? > 2. The docs should be updated to reflect the 1.1 status of > transients.
I would vote for "no" and "yes", respectively. Adding transient support to a collection has a history of adding bugs as well, until they're ironed out. I think 1.1 is the wrong timeframe for that. Perhaps 1.2? I've updated http://clojure.org/transients to reflect vectors and hash-map support of 'transient' in 1.1.0 --Chouser -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
