Hello, 2009/12/15 DTH <dth...@gmail.com>
> On Dec 15, 9:05 pm, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The final step is to apply return-fn to the result: > > (return-fn > > (first (remove > > (comp not predicate-fn) > > (iterate recur-fn a0))) > > > > Damn, well played sir; that's much cleaner. If I might offer one > small tweak: > > (return-fn (some predicate-fn (iterate recur-fn a0))) > > would seem equivalent, though I doubt I'd have got there without your > stepwise guide to change the way I was thinking about it. > No, some does not work here. Dean gave the final word, I think, by reminding us of filter. some does not work because it will return the result of applying predicate-fn to the item, but we want the item "intact" in order to apply return-fn to it. But as said Meikel, and as I was implicitly implying in my final words by just saying "is it something like that you expected", the loop version is not so bad with performance considerations in mind. Cheers, -- Laurent > > Cheers, > > -DTH > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
