On Dec 15, 8:26 am, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Rereading your post I realize that most of your concerns are about the
> general unfriendliness of SLIME and not so much that it isn't working. As
> Phil alludes, SLIME wasn't designed with Clojure in mind, so a lot of things
> happen that don't make a lot of sense (SLIME with Common Lisp is much more
> sensible).
>
> Beside C-c C-k, it sounds like your setup is in fact working well enough for
> you write programs?

Absolutely.  Having no background with SLIME (in particular not
understanding that its CL roots might cause some impedance mismatches
in its interface with Clojure) I just started exploring the menu
options.  My expectation was that virtually everything would "just
work" given emacs' general reputation for hosting lisp variants.  When
I saw a lot of quirks, I thought I might have a broken install or I
might be running into functionality that works fine under *nix but is
broken under Windows (a common occurrence).  So a lot of this exercise
is about recalibrating my expectations as to what should work.  Alas,
googling turns up little in this regard wrt SLIME + Clojure.

   Mike

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to