> objects too. They're not mutually exclusive. It's just that doing > stuff side-effect free pretty much forces you to drop many of the > classic OO patterns.
seems to me that a lot of it comes down to connotations vs. denotations; what /is/ OO, anyway? :-) sincerely. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
