On 7-Dec-09, at 4:16 PM, ataggart wrote: > On Dec 7, 12:37 pm, Bob Hutchison <hutch-li...@recursive.ca> wrote: >> On 7-Dec-09, at 12:17 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote: >>> 2009/12/6 Bob Hutchison <hutch-li...@recursive.ca> >> >>>> Yes! Thanks! The dispatch on type rather than class is the trick. I >>>> actually ended up writing a macro, this is *much* better. >> >>> Please note that in clojure, it's the dispatch on the class that's >>> the >>> "trick", not on the type ;-) >> >> Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Could you expand on that a >> bit? >> > > I think Laurent means that type should be the preferred/standard > mechanism, and class reserved for sneaking over to java-land.
Okay, that makes sense. Maybe I wasn't paying attention but it seems to me that the examples I've seen all use class. But, what I thought doesn't matter... type certainly works nicely. Cheers, Bob ---- Bob Hutchison Recursive Design Inc. http://www.recursive.ca/ weblog: http://www.recursive.ca/hutch -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
