It's also important to get features into Java if you want real substantial JVM performance tuning for them.
On Nov 28, 11:58 am, Christian Vest Hansen <karmazi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Having closures in Java is important because it potentially means type > compatibility for closures across languages. I don't think there will > be a one language to rule the JVM, so features that make it easier to > interoperate multiple languages are useful. > > Also, libraries written in Java with closures in mind can now settle > on a representation, and so interoperability is gained in this area > too. > > > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Daniel Simms <daniel.si...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No comments on this: > > > http://blogs.sun.com/mr/entry/closures > > > yet? It's no help to Clojure, but it's nice to see similar > > motivations. > > > Also, I wanted to chime in with something like "we already have > > closures: use Clojure! or Jython, or... So how about TCO?" > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > -- > Venlig hilsen / Kind regards, > Christian Vest Hansen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
