On Nov 25, 2:59 pm, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hin...@fastmail.net> wrote: > On 25.11.2009, at 15:32, jim wrote: > > > That's exactly what it is. I used the continuation monad from > > clojure.contrib.monads. After I get the code out, I'll be writing a > > tutorial on how it works which will also explain the continuation > > monad. I found that monad to be the most difficult to get my head > > around, but it's hugely powerful. > > I can confirm that impression... And only wish you good luck writing > that tutorial! >
>From the Haskell boys: "Abuse of the Continuation monad can produce code that is impossible to understand and maintain." That sounds to me like a challenge. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
