Ok. Now I get it. Cool stuff On Nov 25, 4:18 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Nov 25, 9:10 am, Gabi <bugspy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > For example why doesn't the following "repeatedly" never crash? > > > (defn repeatedly > > [f] (lazy-seq (cons (f) (repeatedly f)))) > > Because the nested call is deferred until the sequence is realised. > Then the original function already returned. So it does not build up > the stack until it crashes. > > > (last (repeatedly rand)) ;won't crash > > But it won't return either. Not sure which result is more > favorable. ;) > > Sincerely > Meikel
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
