On Nov 20, 8:51 pm, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Krukow <karl.kru...@gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > > I guess I am just asking if the performance guarantees are those I > > would expect of Clojure (i.e., "too fast" ;-)) > > This is definitely still too fast. In fact, it keeps getting worse. > > --Chouser
We gotta stop him ;-) No, more seriously, I really like these new features. Not just for the speed, but for the modeling support. I'm wondering if I could get some feed-back on a defprotocol/deftype example. I am wondering if I am thinking "too object oriented" here and misusing the features, or if I am inline with the intended use of protocols and types. The example code is a "Circuit Breaker" (the stability pattern mentioned in Michael Nygaard's "Release It!"). Code: Circuit breaker states and transitions http://gist.github.com/239797 Circuit breaker http://gist.github.com/239798 Git repository: http://github.com/krukow/clojure-circuit-breaker The circuit breaker has a wrap function that takes another function and returns a wrapped version of that function that uses the circuit breaker. Right now there is only one circuit breaker instance, but that's easy to generalize. Feedback very welcome! /Karl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
