On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Richard Newman <holyg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I suppose a better question might be: would a tree-shaker have a >> reasonable chance of shaking a typical Clojure jar, or are there too >> many dynamic obstacles to a good analysis. > > I'm not sure it's worth solving this through low-level analysis. Far > better, IMO, is to rely on correct descriptors and namespace > definitions -- convention and configuration can save the day. If you > can sweep the hard parts under the proverbial rug, the rest can be > solved in a handful of lines of code!
That's a great point. Thanks Richard and Jim for your thoughts! Best, Graham -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
