On Nov 13, 9:42 am, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote: > In this case, you provide the docs for each method after parameters. > Would the following be possible: > > (defprotocol AProtocol :on AnInterface > "A doc string for AProtocol abstraction" > (bar "bar docs" [a b] :on barMethod) > (baz "baz docs" ([a] [a b] [a b & c]))) > > This matches the rhythm of the rest of the language. > > Sean
+1 for docstring position that matches the rest of the language. I actually think this is a big deal. Other issue regarding docstrings: user=> (doc AProtocol) ------------------------- user/AProtocol nil protocol doc nil user=> (doc bar) ------------------------- user/bar ([a b]) bar doc nil doc gives no indication of any relationship between bar and AProtocol, other than the shared namespace. Is the idea to use a convention of max 1 protocol per namespace? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
