Meikel, What is the gain of using lazy-seq here? Why can't we go without laziness?
(defn group [s] (when-let [s (seq s)] (let [f (first s) [fs & r] (split-with #(= % f) s)] (cons fs (group r))))) Regards, Emeka On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Emeka <emekami...@gmail.com> wrote: > Meikel, > > Is like you over engineered your version? > (defn group > [s] > (lazy-seq > (when-let [s (seq s)] > (let [f (first s) > [fs & r] (split-with #(= % f) s)] > (cons fs (group r)))))) > Should be .. > > (defn group > [s] > (lazy-seq > (when-let [s (seq s)] > (let [f (first s) > [fs r] (split-with #(= % f) s)] > (cons fs (group r)))))) > > & > > Regards, > Emeka > >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---