> I wouldn't bother. The semantics are essentially what the present docs say; > it's just that where calling seq on its argument would just call a method > whose body is "return this;" it skips that no-op for efficiency. (At least, > the body of ASeq.seq() is "return this;"; are there any ISeq implementations > where it isn't?)
I think you're right. I also think that I simply have a problem grokking some of the documentation because it is too terse, and this was an attempt to make things a little more clear - at least in my mind. I think Rich would prefer to keep these docs terse because the more terse the easier it is to maintain. Perhaps what I'm really looking for is a website that has clojure core and contrib docs that are greatly expanded with more verbose descriptions and specific examples. If I had some free time to spare I'd do this. Cheers. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
