I actually restructured my code (not the toy example posted here) to avoid the destructuring, and was disappointed to find it also eventually blows up on 1.6 as well. I'm reasonably certain in that case that I'm not holding on to any of the sequence (since I don't refer to it outside the invocation for the initial value of the loop, so I'm still hoping people can help me suss this out.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
