Hello David, On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:31 PM, dmiller <dmiller2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Miron, > > You discovered what I discovered just a day or two ago: A release or > two ago. the DLR team made some breaking changes to namespaces and > moved a key method to another assembly. I'm really upset by the move > of SimpleCallHelper. I hate to reference the whole Dynamic assembly > just to pick up one method.
I thought that it was a setup issue (turns out it was a different DLR version, could have been other things). This is what prompted me to write the email - I assumed that a clean environment was a chance to get a clear sequence of steps to make things work. > I haven't had a chance to update the ClojureCLR source to fix this > problem. I'll try to get that fixed this weekend. Apologies for your > pain. No need to apologize. We're a .NET shop at work and I'd really love to be able to write some of my money-earning code in Clojure, which would be impossible without ClojureCLR, so I'm actually very grateful. Thanks! > The more final solution will be an installer that takes care of all of > this. That sounds interesting. Any plans for clojure.contrib? I'd be really interested in helping where I can, and porting clojure code to .NET is something I can do. I'm aware of the fact that Clojure core isn't ported completely yet, but I think work can proceed in parallel on core and contrib. Some device to avoid duplicate work on porting clojure.contrib would be nice. Thanks again, -- Miron Brezuleanu --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
