On Oct 29, 9:57 am, Jamie <jsmo...@gmail.com> wrote: > 5. The functionality of the docs hasn't kept up with Clojure. We > often resorted to text searches of the various sources. Need links > and see-also's. Clojure has grown/matured so much that it needs a doc > system of some sort.
I recently started learning Clojure myself, and I agree that the docs could use more work. The book "Programming Clojure" was a good introduction to the language, but it's not a complete reference. I'd like to see something like Lua's language manual for Clojure. Lua's manual (http://www.lua.org/manual/5.1) is concise, complete, and accurate. It's extremely helpful to have a single, de-facto guide to every feature in the language. I wish every language had a freely available document of similar quality, and perhaps it could serve as a model for a Clojure language manual. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
