On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Timothy Pratley <timothyprat...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Oct 28, 6:04 pm, John Harrop <jharrop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It always starts with the zeroth item and skips ahead however many > elements > > were specified. The second argument is the n in > > "every nth item". (You can think of it as the index of the SECOND item to > > take, so (take-nth 3 foo) takes index 0 of foo, then index 3, and so on.) > > Yes I agree it makes perfect sense, but I don't think the doc string > really says that. They probably thought it didn't need to, because the function name does say that. :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
