> You nailed it. It's not about destructuring, it's using doseq to > "bash in place" a transient collection. You won't get correct > results unless you take the return value of 'assoc!' as your new > collection. Even though most of the time it will return the same > transient you passed in with your changes applied to it, > sometimes it returns a new transient. By using doseq you're > losing that returned transient and running into problems.
Ah yes I remember now, the docs state this point clearly. Should have read the docs more carefully. Thank you. > You could try using 'reduce' instead of 'doseq' -- I think that > will point you in the right direction. > BTW, your example args are vectors not arrays. Point taken. Thank you once again. > --Chouser --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
