Thanks for the link. I read somewhere that Rich asked folks to vet stuff on this Google Group first, so that's why I posted it here. I previously posted a "patch" to Clojure here and Rich applied it. I didn't have to do the CA, and if posting my patches into the public domain works - then please consider my patch as public domain. If this works I'd prefer to do the same for all future patches.
P.S. All of my legal and banking work over the past few years (which includes getting VC and forming a startup) was all done with signed PDFs - no snail mail required. I vote to allow a signed CA PDF in addition to postal mail. On Oct 26, 4:14 pm, John Harrop <jharrop...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Jason Wolfe <jawo...@berkeley.edu> wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > Thanks for the patch! Have you seen this page? > > >http://clojure.org/contributing > > > You should follow the instructions there to get your patch included. > > In particular, that page tells you where to post it, and has other > > details; for instance, you must send a CA to Rich before any code you > > write can be incorporated into Clojure. > > What about code someone explicitly places into the public domain? > Uncopyrighted code shouldn't need a CA I'd think. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
