On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Michel Salim > <michael.silva...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Jim was working on logic programming in Clojure up to a few months >> ago, and it seems as if the concern was that the code was too >> derivative. >> >> I have recently made available a Scala-based Kanren implementation; >> the differences between Scala and Scheme means that the code is >> sufficiently original. Most of the code was written based on the >> descriptions of how Mini Kanren works, and not the Scheme >> implementation. And I have signed the Clojure contributor CA. >> >> Would a clean-room implementation based on the Scala code be >> considered sufficiently owned for inclusion in contrib? >> > > That seems sufficiently about the ideas, and not copying the implementation. > Thanks; I'll go ahead and work on it then. Anyone knows who Jim is on Assembla? On Google Groups his email address gets hidden by Google, and he just signed his mails "Jim".
Probably safer not to involve him until the basic code is written, if there is concern about the upstream code seeping in, but it'd be great to get someone who is known to be interested in, eventually. Regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
