That's interesting. I ran this against a quoted Clojure fn of mine and received 92.
I'm curious (general Clojure question) about your use of the quoted form. The Clojure docs state that this results in an unevaluated form, but I had trouble finding more details on this. F.E. I'd like to run count-nodes against a compiled fn that I've previously defined, but I could not get an existing fn into quoted form - and (count-nodes a-fn) always returns 1. Is using a macro the only way to get an expression's unevaluated form? Do you (or anyone) believe some general guidelines could be gathered from running count-nodes against all of the individual fns in a project. F.E. a number > X(?) for a fn means you might be using an imperative style and should be looking at breaking up the fn or looking for ways to use map/reduce/other idiomatic Clojure fns to simplify your code? If yes, maybe the people working on Clojure/Maven (or other Clojure build/package projects) would be interested in making this one of the standard reports. Every time I engage a company for contract work I wonder what I'm in for ( the same goes when I dive in to another open source project). I think it's possible that viewing this metric by fn and by file would give some insight. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
