Jeez, that's amazing. Thanks a lot; I had no idea that trees-seq
existed. I keep getting surprised by Clojure.

On Oct 24, 2:05 pm, James Reeves <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is a slightly faster and somewhat shorter version:
>
> (defn find-dependencies2
>   [rel-rep]
>   (set (filter symbol? (tree-seq seq? rest rel-rep))))
>
> - James
>
> On Oct 24, 9:55 pm, samppi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I suspect the code below can be improved. The function returns the set
> > of all symbols inside a list-tree that are not at the beginning of a
> > list. Is there a way to make the code more compact or faster?
>
> > (with-test
> >   (defn- find-dependencies
> >     [rel-rep]
> >     (cond
> >       (list? rel-rep)
> >         (let [[_ & tail] rel-rep]
> >           (into #{} (mapcat find-dependencies tail)))
> >       (symbol? rel-rep)
> >         #{rel-rep}
> >       :default
> >         nil))
> >   (is (= '#{a b c}
> >          (find-dependencies
> >            '(+ b (- c 3 a))))))
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to