On Oct 18, 12:29 am, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think this is intentional, because the multifn doesn't call the > dispatch function by name. Common usage is to use an anonymous fn for > the dispatch.
Ok, wrapping it in an anonymous function solves the problem; thanks! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
