> I don't think the multiple evaluation matters in this case, since it's > the name parameter, which will in all sane cases be a simple symbol. > gensyms are needed when multiple evaluation could cause side-effects > or an expensive function to be computed multiple times, which is not > the case here.
Yes that is correct Jarkko. The name parameter will only be evaluated as needed and it serves the same purpose as x in the following: (doseq [x [1 2 3]] (println x)) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
