Yes, Bibtex is ugly, but guess what - you newer need to write a single
line. You find a reference in google scholar, copy paste a reference
into your reference file and it works.
Please call Google and ask for another, more lispy export format in
their Google Scholar. Additionally, if you have to suggest, or even
have implemented a reference managing software that uses a lispy
format, I would be glad to try it and use it if it works. Now, THAT
would be a way to contribute :)
Otherwise, what's the point of that constant showing off in a
popularity contest in lispiness? Today I had a sushi for dinner. It
was not lispy at all, and it tasted great.
I like Clojure's syntax too, but don't we all do? Otherwise, we would
have continued using C-like languages. I heard about lisper's
hostility before, but I hope that the Clojure community is going to be
friendly to the outsiders and newcomers :)
Please, tolerate the diversity :)))
On Oct 1, 10:17 pm, John Harrop <jharrop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Dragan Djuric <draga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I usualy cite Rich's conference paper and Stuart's book.
>
> > @conference{hickey2008clojure,
> > title={{The Clojure programming language}},
> > author={Hickey, R.},
> > booktitle={Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Dynamic languages},
> > year={2008},
> > organization={ACM New York, NY, USA}
> > }
>
> Eeeuw. What a non-Lispy syntax. What is that, anyway?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
