Oops, I spoke too hastily -- thank you Jarkko.
On Oct 1, 8:38 pm, timc <timgcl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, its a proxy for an interface.
>
> On Oct 1, 7:22 pm, Jarkko Oranen <chous...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 1, 9:18 pm, timc <timgcl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > <snip>
>
> > > (def prx (proxy [IX][]
> > > (doit
> > > ([] (doseq [x someSeq] (doit x))
> > > ([y] (print y))))
>
> > > When I tried something of this form, it looks like the call of the 1-
> > > arg function from the 0-arg function can't be resolved.
>
> > > Thanks in advance
>
> > I'm not certain, but since it's a java method, shouldn't you call it
> > like (.doit this x)?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
