>From what I've seen of fixtures that just provides setup/teardown functionality (unless I'm mistaken).
In my particular instance, I'm wanting to stub out a function defined elsewhere. The function wraps an SMS sending service so I really won't want to get text messages when running tests. In Java I'd just have an interface with two implementations, and bootstrap the tests with a different implementation, in clojure I guess I'd do something like: (in-ns `some.thing) (defn foo [] nil) or something? -- Pull me down under... On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM, John Harrop <jharrop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Isn't (binding [foo bar] ...) already such a mechanism? Or does the > "fixtures" feature let you specify such a binding for a whole group of tests > obviating the need to repeat the binding form in multiple test functions, > and perhaps let mutable state carry forward through multiple tests instead > of being rebound (and thus reset) after each one? > > (And why does the gmail interface seem designed to encourage users to > top-post?) > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
