Thanks for the answer. > Wrapping a mutable thing like an output stream in an agent seems > dubious to me.
It was intended to use an agent here since I need to control the access to the write object. But what I forgot was ' the validator succeeds or if no validator was given, the return value of the given fn will become the new state of the Agent.' The function that was called by the agent returned nil, so the writer object was lost. But as you said it is better to pass the out object instead of the agent anyway. Regards Roger --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
