I agree though, proxy is off-putting. It just looks so much less clean than the rest of Clojure.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:43 PM, CuppoJava <patrickli_2...@hotmail.com>wrote: > > Hi Nikolay, > In my opinion it's hard to reduce the verbosity of proxy without > sacrificing some of its generality. For my own code I just made a > new_listener macro that simply returns a new actionListener for me. > This worked fine since 99% of the time, I only use proxies for > actionListeners anyway. I think you're probably too focused on making > sproxy as general as you can, which sometimes is not always better. > > My code simply looks like this: > > (new_listener > (println "Running") > (.getEventName action_event)) > > I think that's very readable is it not? > -Patrick > > > -- John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
