This might be good to integrate with ring as well? On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Adrian Cuthbertson <adrian.cuthbert...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Could you put it on GitHub anyway? It would be a good way to evaluate >> it. > > +1 - I'd be interested in using it. > > - Adrian. > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Sean Devlin<francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Could you put it on GitHub anyway? It would be a good way to evaluate >> it. >> >> On Sep 10, 12:36 am, Richard Newman <holyg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Would anyone have any interest in a content negotiation library making >>> its way into contrib? >>> >>> That is, a library with a public function that takes an Accept: header >>> from an HTTP request, and your server-side preferences, and spits out >>> which Content-Type you should produce. >>> >>> This is important for "proper REST" apps. (I don't see any >>> functionality like this in Compojure.) >>> >>> I have one about 80% done (compared to one I wrote in Python). Pure >>> Clojure; the only dependency is on str-utils. >>> >>> If there's no interest in it getting into contrib, I'll just stick it >>> on GitHub. >> > >> > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
