What's your current condlet definition ? 2009/9/8 Gorsal <s...@tewebs.com>
> > #<CompilerException java.lang.Exception: Unsupported binding form: > (G__1852 2) (NO_SOURCE_FILE:1182)> > So, I'm porting Paul Grahm's condlet macro to clojure. I've done it > except when i evaluate it it gives me the above error. However, when I > macroexpand-1 it it evaluates fine. > > The only difference between evaluating the macroexpansion vs the other > way is that the (gensym) vars are now regular variables in the > macroexpanded version. However, i don't see how this can affect it. > > (condlet [((= 2 2) (a 2) (b 3)) > ((= 3 4) (a 1) (b 4) (c 34))] > (print a)) --> throws error > > macroexpanded version where lcond is equivalent to a lisp cond and > same for llet. This evaluates > just fine! > > (clojure.core/letfn > ((G__1840 [a b c] (print a))) > (user/lcond > ((= 2 2) > (user/llet > (G__1841 G__1842 G__1843) > (user/llet ((G__1841 2) (G__1842 3)) (G__1840 G__1841 G__1842 > G__1843)))) > ((= 3 4) > (user/llet > (G__1841 G__1842 G__1843) > (user/llet > ((G__1841 1) (G__1842 4) (G__1843 34)) > (G__1840 G__1841 G__1842 G__1843)))))) > > What am i missing here? I've heard of this same error with cond-let > and the guy changed it due to the 'new everything that lets must have > bracket regime'? What's this? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
