On Sep 5, 6:55 pm, Mark Volkmann <r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have lots of detail on this in my article
> athttp://ociweb.com/mark/stm/article.html.
Yes, it's bookmarked in the "TO READ" group :-) I just want to be
precise in my presentation.
> I'd say it means "block" as in wait until the other finishes.
But writers blocking readers, and readers/writers blocking writers is
certainly possible with the ReadWriteLocks, although (as you also
point out) locks are only hold very briefly.
<snip>
> I can't see how this would help. There is very little synchronization
> now. The current STM seems pretty optimized.
Yes, don't get me wrong - I think it is a wonderful model and
implementation. I was just looking for any possible optimizations.
/Karl
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
