On Sep 3, 1:13 am, Sudish Joseph <sud...@gmail.com> wrote: > The other solutions seem higher level, but it's worth noting that > destructuring -- (let [[x & xs] lst] ...) -- uses next and is therefore > not fully lazy in that you will peek ahead by one into the lazy > sequence, so to speak. You have to use explicit first / rest to get > that: [snip...]
Thanks everyone. I like the contrib version particularly. Regarding eagerness of let: now that you mention it I recall that from a recent thread. http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/32ff3ca7e2649867/ba0aa1edf7cfaeb1?hl=en I think '&&' would be a nice addition. /Karl --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
