On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Tim Snyder<tsnyder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Well, I can see that LazySeq does indeed catch and wrap all Exceptions > > in a RuntimeException. I also think I can work around it, but I'd > > like to know why this was done? > > > > Was it necessary given the checked vs. unchecked exception system of > > Java? > > > > Yes. > What about declaring IFn.invoke() as "throws Exception"? Or did you think that would make calling Clojure from Java too painful? Or was there some other reason? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
