+1 Coming across that problem just yesterday.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Sean Devlin<francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > On Aug 28, 9:41 am, Chas Emerick <cemer...@snowtide.com> wrote: >> Definitely +1, yes. >> >> - Chas >> >> On Aug 28, 2009, at 4:27 AM, Mike Hinchey wrote: >> >> > I have a suggestion for the with-open macro. It calls .close when >> > it's finished. I'd like it to have a (defmulti close type) so it's >> > behavior is extensible. A standard method could be defined for >> > java.io.Closeable and a :default method with no type hint. I've >> > come across a few cases where some external library defines what is >> > essentially a close method but names it shutdown or disable, etc., >> > and defining my own close method would be much easier than rewriting >> > with-open. This would also allow people to eliminate reflection for >> > classes like sql Connection that were created before Closeable. >> >> > I'll submit a patch if it's wanted. This would fit in core, or >> > maybe contrib.duck-streams with a slightly different name. >> >> > -Mike > > > -- Florian Ebeling florian.ebel...@gmail.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
