I think there are a lot of people who need to choose between Clojure
and Scala to study as a "new" language. I must say that both are bad:
* Clojure doc is hard to understand.
* Scala grammar is complicated.

I prefer Clojure. I think Clojure feature at this time is OK, thus the
decisive point to draw people to Clojure is doc. I wonder if the doc
at this time is obvious for LISP people, but comming from C/C++, Java,
Ruby, and Erlang (Erlang doc is bad, but it is paradise compared to
that of Clojure :D) and even after reading the Clojure book, I must
say that I can't understand 99% of the doc of both clojure and clojure-
contrib.

For example, what does the following mean?
-------------------------
(-> x form)
(-> x form & more)
Macro
Threads the expr through the forms. Inserts x as the second item in
the first form, making a list of it if it is not a list already. If
there are more forms, inserts the first form as the second item in
second form, etc.
-------------------------

My wish: There are easy-to-understand examples in API doc.

Rails is easy to use largely because there are examples in doc of
every API function.


On Aug 26, 12:37 pm, Alan Busby <thebu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:43 AM, npowell <nathan.pow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I mean, I didn't think the article was terribly in depth, but a real,
> > evenhanded comparison would be enlightening.
>
> Reducing it further, I'd be interested just to hear more about the contrast
> of static typing versus macros. Which is more beneficial for different
> situations and why?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to