I'm also looking for a satisfactory answer to this problem. So far I'm slightly in favor of putting the "data" (ie. the sequence/ collection/object ...) first in the argument list and the "parameters" following.
This is because there's so many core functions that take a function and arguments and applies this to some data. These functions always assume the "data" comes first in the argument list. If I were to have my way, I would redefine all the clojure.core functions to assume the "data" is the last argument instead of the first. (this includes ->) This way they would play nice with both partial and ->. I'm not sure if there's a serious drawback to that suggestion that I haven't noticed though. -Patrick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
