2009/8/16 John Newman <john...@gmail.com>: > In general, when writing documentation about software, you have to ask your > self "what if the user downloaded 0.9?" or "what if the user downloaded > 1.1?" How do you know what other docs someone might have written, that > might have led the user to have downloaded one version or another? So the > doc's author was probably trying to be general, expecting you to know what > to do. Some people won't though.
True, but in this case, I think, it is like that because before 1.0 was released the jar was called "clojure.jar". Only when 1.0 was released was the version number included in the jar file name. > Perhaps some more specific wording like "replace 'clojure.jar' with the > version of Clojure that you have downloaded." might be of help with those > edge cases. Yes, that's probably a good idea. -- Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
