On Aug 14, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Chouser wrote: > So in general 1 is in my opinion a fairly minor syntax > thing, while 2 could be somewhat alleviated if Clojure had > a string literal format that allowed un-escaped double > quotes and left backslashes unmolested. This would allow > things like (infix #'''5*2'''). Again, not pretty but > perhaps better than nothing.
...and then someone wants to embed python source in a clojure file, and comes calling on the clojure group to complain about the broken triple-quoted string literal reader macro. ;-) - Chas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---